Skip to content
recurance

Daniela Pani

28 Mar 2024 · Coroner Robert Simpson · Berkshire

This report repeats 2 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of Samaritan signs on platforms

    “A lack of Samaritan signs on the platforms or within the stations”
  2. 2. low car park line side fencing

    “Car park line side fencing being too low”
  3. 3. lack of guidance for service users declining meetings

    “training and guidance did not specifically address how to deal with service users declining a visit or meeting”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningAshley Matthews23 Jul 2015 · 8 years 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“(1 During the course of the inquest, evidence suggested that access to the site was gained by insecure fencing.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Car park line side fencing being too low. The proposed mitigation was replacement of the fencing.”
Full chain: Inadequate fencing allowing unauthorized railway access
Repeats an earlier warningChristine Gould28 May 2021 · 2 years 10 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“In [name redacted]' case, earlier consideration to the fence boundary being a credible route of access may have led to the fence boundary being improved more quickly after her death.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Car park line side fencing being too low. The proposed mitigation was replacement of the fencing.”
Full chain: Inadequate fencing allowing unauthorized railway access

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error