Skip to content
recurance

Corinne Haslam

21 Jul 2023 · Coroner Chris Morris · Manchester South

This report repeats 4 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of mental health ward access to physical health specialists

    “The court heard evidence as to the barriers which exist and make it difficult for staff working on mental health wards to obtain input from physical health specialists without sending a patient to hospital via the Emergency Department”
  2. 2. information silos between mental and physical health

    “It is a matter of concern that Mental Health Trusts and Acute Trusts operate different (apparently incompatible) electronic records systems”
  3. 3. lack of VTE risk assessment guidance

    “It is a matter of concern that ward-based nursing staff do not appear to have been provided with clear and unambiguous guidance as to the circumstances when a risk assessment for Venous Thromboembolism ('VTE') should be undertaken following admission to a ward, and the circumstances in which such risk assessment should be repeated”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningAdrian Jennings19 Apr 2018 · 5 years 3 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The inquest heard evidence that the Mental Health Trust had not introduced one IT system across the Trust, which impacted on information sharing between professionals involved in his care;”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“It is a matter of concern that Mental Health Trusts and Acute Trusts operate different (apparently incompatible) electronic records systems. The absence of such a unified records system creates obstacles as to the transfer of important clinical information between mental health and physical health specialists (and vice versa),”
Full chain: Incompatible electronic records hinder mental health information sharing
Repeats an earlier warningGordon Fenton23 Apr 2020 · 3 years 3 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“There does not appear to be a reliable and consistent method of sharing medical records and information between the two Trusts.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“It is a matter of concern that Mental Health Trusts and Acute Trusts operate different (apparently incompatible) electronic records systems.”
Full chain: Incompatible electronic records hinder mental health information sharing
Repeats an earlier warningJoanna Leven30 Apr 2021 · 2 years 3 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“Hospital and Mental Health Liaison staff are working with different | computer-based records systems.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Mental Health Trusts and Acute Trusts operate different (apparently incompatible) electronic records systems.”
Full chain: Incompatible electronic records between mental and physical health services
Repeats an earlier warningSophia Ayuk20 Jan 2023 · 6 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“At no time during the two periods of Ms [name redacted] inpatient care was she assessed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in contravention of trust policy.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“It is a matter of concern that ward-based nursing staff do not appear to have been provided with clear and unambiguous guidance as to the circumstances when a risk assessment for Venous Thromboembolism ('VTE') should be undertaken following admission to a ward, and the circumstances in which such risk assessment should be repeated.”
Full chain: Lack of VTE risk assessment guidance

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error