Skip to content
recurance

Colin Blackburn

17 Sept 2021 · Coroner David Reid · Worcestershire

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of initial ACCT case review within 24 hours

    “no Initial ACCT Case Review was held within 24 hours of the Concern & Keep Safe form being completed on 21.6.19”
  2. 2. delayed ACCT case manager assignment

    “no ACCT Case Manager was assigned until 26.6.19”
  3. 3. lack of case manager involvement post-transfer

    “no ACCT Case Manager had any effective involvement after Mr. [name redacted] was transferred from the Inpatients unit to Houseblock 6 on a Bo”
  4. 4. missing post-incident review

    “no ACCT Case Review took place after the first ligature incident on 2.7.19”
  5. 5. ligature incident not recorded in NOMIS

    “the second ligature incident on 2.7.19 was not documented on Mr. [name redacted] NOMIS record”
  6. 6. delayed ACCT case review

    “the ACCT Case Review arranged for 3.7.19 did not in fact take place until 4.7.19”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningReggie Johns16 Sept 2013 · 8 years earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“(3) Further concerns involved the failure of the nurse to be provided with the ACCT document when Mr [name redacted] was interviewed by her and her further failure to make any entry within that document detailing her professional view.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“that no Initial ACCT Case Review was held within 24 hours of the Concern & Keep Safe form being completed on 21.6.19;”
Full chain: Delayed ACCT case review and documentation failure
Raised again laterRickie Poon4 Jan 2026 · 4 years 4 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“(a) that no Initial ACCT Case Review was held within 24 hours of the Concern & Keep Safe form being completed on 21.6.19;”

Later report

“the ACCT process was not managed and implemented properly, e.g. supervising officers did not consistently acquaint themselves with case notes or history when completing reviews;”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ACCT case review and inadequate process management

Responses

2021-0311-Response-from-Practice-Plus-Group.pdf ↗· Practice Plus Group

Stated action · 31st October 2021

“The end date for the acceptance of paper referrals is 31st October 2021. From 1st November 2021, paper TAGs (Threshold Assessment Grid)1 will cease to be an option for referrals to the mental health team.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error