Skip to content
recurance

Christopher Higgins

24 Dec 2015 · Coroner Jacqueline Lake · Norfolk

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. staff unawareness of observation requirements

    “It became clear during evidence, that members of staff are not aware of what is required of them when they carry out Observations on a patient. This was particularly evident with regard to Observations to be carried out on a "two members of staff to one patient" basis. Areas of confusion include how staff are to engage with a patient, how close they are required to be with regard to the patient, i.e. at arm's length or within eyesight and how to record the information gained from the Observation”
  2. 2. inadequate escort policy for patient transfer

    “The Escort Policy does not include information relating to the transfer of patients from one place to another (in this case from an Acute Hospital to the Fermoy Unit) when other services are involved, for.instance the Police. In particular, Mr [name redacted] who had been acting in an unpredictable and paranoid manner, was put into a cage at the rear of the Police van with three Police Officers, with no Mental Health staff to accompany him”
  3. 3. unassessed disabled ramp safety

    “The safety of the environment where the incident took place, namely a disabled ramp with a railing along the edge and a concrete'floor, had not been risk assessed prior to taking Mr [name redacted] outside for a cigarette”
  4. 4. lack of protocol for detained patient assessment

    “There is no agreement in place between the NSFT and the Acute Hospital as to the best way to deal with patients subject to detention under the Mental Health Act who require assessment and treatment at A & E, as a result of which Mr [name redacted], was required to wait over 2 hours in a busy, public area, having already self-harmed and shown signs of paranoia”

Linked reports

Raised again laterEliot Harris22 Aug 2022 · 6 years 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

This report

“It became clear during evidence, that members of staff are not aware of what is required of them when they carry out Observations on a patient.”

Later report

“Substantial evidence was heard at the inquest with regard to observations which were not carried out in respect of [the deceased] in accordance with NSFT's Policy and with regard to staff not undergoing training and assessment of their competency to carry out observations correctly.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Staff unawareness of observation requirements

Responses

2015-0480-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action · end of March 2016

“the ' Trust has decided to fully enclose the ramp. This work has commenced and is proposed to be completed by the end of March 2016”

Stated action

“The Trust is taking this matter further than the Norfolk acute hospitals instructing. managers based in Suffolk to liaise with their acute hospital colleagues as well, Each area is working to create local protocols which will be incorporated into policy.”

2015-0480-Response-by-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospital-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Stated action · 29 February 2016

“The Trust currently experiences a significant level of attendance in the Emergency Department from patients presenting with mental health problems or self-harm and as such is constantly seeking ways to improve the experience for these patients. It is hoped that this planned pathway for patients from an inpatient mental health bed will improve both the experience and safety of this particular cohort of patients.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error