Skip to content
recurance

Guided path, Step 1 of 4

See a chainStart

Chentoori Chanthirakumar

5 Feb 2016 · Coroner ME Hassell · London Inner (North)
Check this reportOriginal

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of personal meeting to discuss re-take decision

    “Barts and the London, both in terms of certain individuals within it and as an organisation, took its pastoral responsibilities very seriously indeed and made great efforts to support this student, there was one aspect of their processes that I think would benefit from review”

  2. 2. breach of patient confidentiality in mental health communication

    “nurses and doctors working in mental health particularly, would benefit from a reminder of the difference between absorbing (and, if appropriate, acting upon) concerns raised by a patient's relatives, friends, tutors etc., and divulging a patient's private details”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error