Skip to content
recurance

Charles Pierson

6 Aug 2014 · Coroner ARW Forrest · South Leicestershire

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. continued driving without vision review

    “A practitioner registered with the General Optical Council gave a statement to the effect that the deceased, when subject to an eye examination was able to meet the vision standard set for drivers by the DVLA. A review of his documented findings by DVLA staff indicated that was not the case. The DVLA opinion is that the deceased should have been informed by his optician to inform DVLA of the findings. This was not done and as aresult the deceased continued to drive without a review of his vision”

Responses

2015-0366-Response-by-General-Optical-Council.pdf ↗· The General Optical Council

Stated action

“The GOC can consider disclosing the decision to you however, if a specific request is made. If you would like to obtain a copy of the full decision, please submit your request by email to”

Pierson-2014-0366a.pdf ↗· The General Optical Council

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Charles Pierson · Recurance