Skip to content
recurance

Brian Francis

4 Mar 2015 · Coroner Sarah-Jane Richards · Powys, Bridgend & Glamorgan Valleys

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. failure to review patient by Consultant

    “The process of a Consultant's attendance on patient being noted by a 'tick in the box' on a paper record failed. The box had been ticked when in fact the patient had not been reviewed by the Consultant.”
  2. 2. unavailable community medical records

    “Had the Community medical records been available at the time of hospital admission the patient would most probably have been assessed differently and in all probability, anti-coagulation therapy commenced immediately or shortly thereafter.”
  3. 3. delayed Consultant review

    “Ensuring patients once 'clerked' within emergency medicine have prompt Consultant review.”
  4. 4. lack of notification to ward staff

    “Notification that the review has occurred to be indicated to Ward staff.”
  5. 5. inaccessible electronic community records

    “For Community Health Care records to be electronically available to Emergency Medicine Departments”

Responses

2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board.pdf ↗· Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Brian Francis · Recurance