Skip to content
recurance

Benjamin Clark

8 Jul 2021 · Coroner Carly Henley · Newcastle Upon Tyne and North Tyneside

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. downgraded falls risk without justification

    “despite Mr [name redacted] having been assessed to be a Level 3 Risk of Falls in Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital (NSECH), when he was transferred to North Tyneside General Hospital his falls risk was downgraded to Level 2 without any notes being provided to justify this reassessment”
  2. 2. inconsistent observation level

    “Matron told me that at the time of the fall, Mr [name redacted] was under observation as though he was a Level 1 falls risk, despite being assessed as Level 2. Note keeping was suboptimal and there was a lack of clarity as to whether he should have been observed every 30 minutes or every 60 minutes”
  3. 3. lack of documented reassessment

    “The Avoiding Falls Level of Observation Assessment Tool (AFLOAT) was used in both hospitals but only NSECH evidenced use of this tool in writing. Observational charts were not in use in North Tyneside General Hospital. Matron told me that every patient should be reassessed every day and following any significant change in presentation. There was a lack of written evidence at North Tyneside General Hospital to demonstrate that this had been done in Mr. [name redacted] case”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Benjamin Clark · Recurance