Anthony Slack
A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.
The coroner's concerns
1. limited documentation of observations
“The documentation available at the inquest from the home was limited in detail. As a result, it was difficult to understand what observations had been undertaken by care home staff who were monitoring him.”
2. limited quality observations
“The evidence given at the inquest was that the observations were of limited quality notwithstanding the diagnosis of Covid 19 and his vulnerability.”
3. admission of untested residents
“The inquest heard that after the home went into lockdown Covid 19 was found in residents within the home. At the inquest the home were unclear I if staff had brought it into the home or if the admission of residents from the community who were not tested for Covid 19 before admission were the cause of it entering the home. There was no risk assessment in place relating to admission of new residents”
4. uncertain PPE requirements
“Staff were unclear as to the PPE requirements as a result of changes to the guidance that were occurring on a regular basis and it was unclear how changes were being shared with staff and implemented.”
5. ambulance delay
“The inquest heard that the ambulance was delayed due to shortages of available ambulances. The inquest was told this was driven by a number of factors. This included staff absences due to the need to self-isolate awaiting testing and the increased cleaning needs in relation to ambulances required by Covid 19. The inquest was told that at some points in the day and in some acute trusts, ambulance crews were being supported by on-site cleaning crews. This meant quicker turnaround times and”
Linked reports
This report
“The documentation available at the inquest from the home was limited in detail. As a result, it was difficult to understand what observations had been undertaken by care home staff who were monitoring him.”
Later report
“Overall documentation at the home was limited and lacked detail”
Responses
2020-0264-Response-from-CQC-Redacted.pdf ↗· Vicarage Residential Care Home, PH England
2020-0264-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and NHS England
Stated action · February
“The Care Home confirmed that; 1. The Provider/Registered Manager is speaking to staff individually to reiterate the need for thorough record keeping in relation to falls but also generally. A documentation awareness training offer has been made to the Provider/Registered Manager by Tameside and Glossop CCG Quality Improvement Team. This has been accepted and sessions will take place in February via Microsoft Teams. The Local Authority require all providers to comply with good record keeping”
2020-0264-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Digital-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and NHS England
Stated action
“I have liaised directly with the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) in respect of your concerns.”
2020-0264-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and NHS England
Stated action
“PHE has established a national team to lead the organisational response to COVID- 19 in adult social care settings.”
2020-0264-Response-from-Vicarage-Care-Home-Redacted.pdf ↗· Vicarage Residential Care Home, PH England