Skip to content
recurance

Anthony Slack

1 Dec 2020 · Coroner Alison Mutch · Greater Manchester South

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. limited documentation of observations

    “The documentation available at the inquest from the home was limited in detail. As a result, it was difficult to understand what observations had been undertaken by care home staff who were monitoring him.”
  2. 2. limited quality observations

    “The evidence given at the inquest was that the observations were of limited quality notwithstanding the diagnosis of Covid 19 and his vulnerability.”
  3. 3. admission of untested residents

    “The inquest heard that after the home went into lockdown Covid 19 was found in residents within the home. At the inquest the home were unclear I if staff had brought it into the home or if the admission of residents from the community who were not tested for Covid 19 before admission were the cause of it entering the home. There was no risk assessment in place relating to admission of new residents”
  4. 4. uncertain PPE requirements

    “Staff were unclear as to the PPE requirements as a result of changes to the guidance that were occurring on a regular basis and it was unclear how changes were being shared with staff and implemented.”
  5. 5. ambulance delay

    “The inquest heard that the ambulance was delayed due to shortages of available ambulances. The inquest was told this was driven by a number of factors. This included staff absences due to the need to self-isolate awaiting testing and the increased cleaning needs in relation to ambulances required by Covid 19. The inquest was told that at some points in the day and in some acute trusts, ambulance crews were being supported by on-site cleaning crews. This meant quicker turnaround times and”

Linked reports

Raised again laterJames Astley10 Sept 2024 · 3 years 9 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“The documentation available at the inquest from the home was limited in detail. As a result, it was difficult to understand what observations had been undertaken by care home staff who were monitoring him.”

Later report

“Overall documentation at the home was limited and lacked detail”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inaccurate and inconsistent care plan entries and record keeping

Responses

2020-0264-Response-from-CQC-Redacted.pdf ↗· Vicarage Residential Care Home, PH England

2020-0264-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and NHS England

Stated action · February

“The Care Home confirmed that; 1. The Provider/Registered Manager is speaking to staff individually to reiterate the need for thorough record keeping in relation to falls but also generally. A documentation awareness training offer has been made to the Provider/Registered Manager by Tameside and Glossop CCG Quality Improvement Team. This has been accepted and sessions will take place in February via Microsoft Teams. The Local Authority require all providers to comply with good record keeping”

2020-0264-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Digital-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and NHS England

Stated action

“I have liaised directly with the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) in respect of your concerns.”

2020-0264-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and NHS England

Stated action

“PHE has established a national team to lead the organisational response to COVID- 19 in adult social care settings.”

2020-0264-Response-from-Vicarage-Care-Home-Redacted.pdf ↗· Vicarage Residential Care Home, PH England

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error