Skip to content
recurance

Alfred Sykes

18 Jun 2019 · Coroner Andrew Bridgman · Manchester (South)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. high risk missing person not acted upon

    “GMP were informed that Mr [name redacted] was missing at around 8.00pm on 7" February. He was treated as a high risk missing person from the outset”
  2. 2. delayed discovery of body

    “On 11'" February two members of the public (one of whom knew of [the deceased]) and who had heard he was missing also took it upon themselves to search the fields, finding him”
  3. 3. insufficient officer deployment

    “Had there been a greater number of officers deployed on the morning of 8" February to search the fields to which [the deceased] had been directed and was last seen walking towards, it is likely he would have been found that morning”
  4. 4. family distress

    “lessened the anguish for the family”
  5. 5. wasted resources

    “saved resources in the continued search over the following 3 days”

Responses

2019-0201-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Police-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Police

Stated action

“The fields located off Woodsmoor Lane should have formed part of the search area and as such search trained police officers or members of the Mountain Rescue Team with the appropriate experience and training should have been deployed into the playing fields.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Alfred Sykes · Recurance