Skip to content
recurance

Alexander Tostevin

6 Dec 2021 · Coroner Brendan Allen · Dorset

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of independence of DCMH

    “The medical care provided to service personnel through the DCMH is not truly independent, in that personal medical information may be disclosed to Chain of Command where substantial public interest demands disclosure, particularly for the protection of the operational capability of the Unit and the safety of other Unit personnel. This is, of course, unlike mental health care provided in a civilian context. The evidence heard at the Inquest was that this lack of independence risks service personnel”
  2. 2. absence of composite risk assessment and care plan

    “There is no single composite risk assessment and care plan for service users that draws tooether all the relevant information for 2 a service user and identifies the plan in place (care plan and risk management plan) at any given time. Such as document is often used in other care settings, including mental health trusts.”
  3. 3. lack of independence of DCMH

    “The lack of independence of DCMH risks service users minimising and/or under reporting the risks they may pose to themselves for fear that information may be disclosed to the Chain of Command. If the true extent of the risk of is not known by DCMH, an effective risk management plan to mitigate the risk of cannot be formulated.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningPaul Hills19 Nov 2020 · 1 year 1 month earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.78 · moderate

Earlier report

“Care plan had not been updated since October 2019 and his risk assessment remained the same even when the scores changed and there was evidence of escalating risk behaviour.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“There is no single composite risk assessment and care plan for service users that draws tooether all the relevant information for 2 a service user and identifies the plan in place (care plan and risk management plan) at any given time”
Full chain: Outdated care plan and risk assessment
Raised again laterCharlie Owen29 Nov 2024 · 3 years later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

This report

“The medical care provided to service personnel through the DCMH is not truly independent, in that personal medical information may be disclosed to Chain of Command where substantial public interest demands disclosure”

Later report

“I was concerned to hear that when a risk management and safety plan has been prepared by the Defence mental health services the information contained about relevant protective factors and safety actions is not necessarily shared with the Chain of Command.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of independence leads to non-disclosure fears

Responses

2021-0407-Response-from-Ministry-of-Defence_Published.pdf ↗· Ministry of Defence

Stated action

“case. I will address each area in turn. Disclosure of information between DCMH and the Chain of Command. DCMH operates as an independent organisation, which sits within Defence Primary Healthcare (DPHC), a Tri-Service organisation in UK Strategic Command. Although military DCMH staff2 are drawn from the medical services of the Royal Navy (RN), Army and Royal Air Force (RAF), DCMH is independent of all three Service chains of command. Mental health services play a vital Occupational Health role in”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error