Skip to content
recurance

Alan Fallows

19 Aug 2024 · Coroner Adam Hodson · Birmingham and Solihull

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. incident not logged and reviewed

    “the failure to create the DATIX here could be a one- off, I am concerned that staff may not be aware of the importance of completing these reports and doing so in a timely fashion, which I understand should be completed within 24 hours of incident or knowledge of an incident”
  2. 2. automated approval of Datix reports

    “the Datix relating to the fall of 12 February (code U454194) appears to have undergone some kind of automated approval and sign off process in June 2024, and regrettably staff were unable to shed any light during the inquest on what happened/happens during this process.”
  3. 3. use of templates in Datix reports

    “nursing staff utilise templates or pro-forma text when completing DATIX reports. The use of templates, whilst time saving, can easily lead to incorrect or incomplete information being provided on incidents (as happened in Mr [name redacted]' care) and therefore there is a real risk that opportunities will be lost to correctly investigate incidents which affect patient safety and which may cause a risk of death”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error