Skip to content
recurance

Ahmed Tabeche

11 May 2018 · Coroner Nadia Persaud · London (East)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. risk of choking

    “The evidence given by the nursing staff and care staff who continue to work in the Care Home did not indicate a full understanding of the gravity of the risk of choking. Matters such as not causing offence to visitors or concern of turning the Home into a prison were quoted as reasons why food might not be fully checked. Care staff did not appear to appreciate that where a patient is at risk of choking, robust systems need to be in place to protect their lives.”
  2. 2. risk of choking from visitors

    “I note that action has been taken by the Care Home to place more posters around the Home, informing visitors to notify the nurse in charge before giving food to the loved ones. | do not consider that this is sufficient to address the concerns that have arisen in this case. The visitor who had been feeding Mr [name redacted] confirmed that he focussed fully on Mr [name redacted] when he attended. He did not read posters which were located inside Mr [name redacted] room. He was not given any written information on the”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Ahmed Tabeche · Recurance