Skip to content
recurance

Inaccurate post mortem sampling in suspected anaphylaxis cases

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high3 reports · 2019–2025No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Royal College of Pathologists received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 5 Nov 2019 and 25 Nov 2025.

They came from 3 different coroners in 3 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

3
reports
3
different coroners
2019–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Christopher Byron↗

    5 Nov 2019 · Joanne Kearsley · Manchester (North)

    “The quality of the post mortem examination report produced i was wholly unsatisfactory and proven inaccurate.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Royal College of Pathologists was found for this report.

  2. 3 years 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Celia Marsh↗

    21 Nov 2022 · Maria Voisin · Avon

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · higha different coroner
    “- If bloods are taken at hospital that they are not destroyed in a suspected case but retained for testing”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Royal College of Pathologists responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Royal College of Pathologists is currently updating its autopsy practice guidelines for suspected acute anaphylaxis. The updated guidelines will include contact details for the UKFAR and direct pathologists to report fatal anaphylaxis cases to the UKFAR.”
  3. 3 years later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Benedict Blythe↗

    25 Nov 2025 · Elizabeth Gray · Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “a. blood samples for mast cell tryptase and sp IgE serology 2 suspected allergens b. stomach contents to be immediately stored (and/or frozen) by the pathologist for the analysis of the presence of the triggering allergen”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Royal College of Pathologists responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  4. All reports to Royal College of Pathologists

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error