Skip to content
recurance

Unrecognised oesophageal intubation and unconfirmed tracheal tube placement

Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2017–2024 One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 17 Nov 2017 and 19 Jul 2024.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2017–2024
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Peter Saint↗

    17 Nov 2017 · Sean Horstead · Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

    “During the course of evidence | heard that an (admitted)”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Trust has confirmed that a Serious Incident Investigation Report has been carried out. They concluded that: 'endotracheal tubes 1 and 2 were incorrectly placed in the oesophagus rather than the trachea. Contributing High quality care for all, now and for future generations to this was the failure to recognise this resulted in prolonged loss of the airway, oxygenation and subsequent cardiorespiratory arrest and hypoxic brain injuiry.”

    Stated timescale: February 2018

  2. 6 years 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Joseph Parker↗

    19 Jul 2024 · M.E. Voisin · Avon

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “(1) I have been told that capnography is the only reliable test, the gold standard, to confirm that a tracheal tube is in the right place, that no other test should override it.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error