Inadequate ACCT documentation and healthcare absence during reviews
HMP Woodhill received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 26 May 2016 and 6 Nov 2019.
They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“(1)During the course of the evidence | was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ HMP Woodhill responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗
“The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open.”
- 3 years 5 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“it became apparent during the course of the evidence that ACCT reviews were being conducted on many occasions without someone from Healthcare being in attendance.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:courseevidence
The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.
- All reports to HMP Woodhill
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2016 → 2019Darren Williams3 years 5 months after Ian Brown · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports identify shortcomings in the ACCT (Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork) process at HMP Woodhill. The earlier report focuses on inadequate implementation of recommendations to improve ACCT documentation, while the later report notes that healthcare staff are often absent from ACCT reviews.
Ian Brown · 26 May 2016
“(1)During the course of the evidence | was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Darren Williams · 6 Nov 2019
“it became apparent during the course of the evidence that ACCT reviews were being conducted on many occasions without someone from Healthcare being in attendance.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open.”
Stated action
“The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open.”
No published response from HMP Woodhill was found for this report. It is the most recent report, so a response may not be due or published yet.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to HMP Woodhill at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 → 2019 | 0.65 | 0.05 | Closely related · 0.90 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for HMP Woodhill
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.