Skip to content
recurance

Lack of information sharing between online prescribing services and GP systems

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2023–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 7 Feb 2023 and 31 Jan 2025.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2023–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Ania Sohail↗

    7 Feb 2023 · Catherine McKenna · Manchester North

    “There is no requirement for the on-line pharmacies to share information with the patient's GP. This means that, in the absence of the patient's consent to share information, the online prescriber is reliant on the accuracy and truthfulness of the history provided by the patient.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Trust has subsequently been the subject of an NHS England-commissioned independent investigation into the failings within the Trust's services reported at the Edenfield Centre and the failure within the organisation to appropriately manage concerns and mitigate against patient harm. The investigation's final report was published in January 2024 and notes that Griffin Ward has now been closed. The Trust has developed an improvement plan, which was updated to reflect the findings of the independent”

    Stated timescale: January 2024

  2. 2 years later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Kim Robinson↗

    31 Jan 2025 · Nigel Parsley · Suffolk

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The need for online prescribers to be able to access a patient's records (at least the Summary Care Records). These records could be attached to the consultation for review by the prescriber.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:onlinepatient'sprescriber

    Department of Health and Social Care responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error