Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate clinical records hinder investigations

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high5 reports · 2022–2024 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Barking received 5 coroners' reports about this hazard between 4 Nov 2022 and 25 Oct 2024.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 4 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 4 of the 4 earlier reports, stating 15 specific actions.

5
reports
1
coroner
2022–2024
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Peter Ross↗

    4 Nov 2022 · Graeme Irvine · East London

    “Clinical records were poorly maintained, exacerbating the lapses in communication between those treating Mr [name redacted].”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Barking responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “has completed all the actions assigned to the department within the Trust's SI recommendations and subsequent Action Plan. If any scan is mis- reported, the Department uses it as a learning opportunity, and it is reviewed at the Departmental Radiology Event and Learning Meeting (REALM) and undertakes a process of peer review. The Radiology Department has reviewed Mr [name redacted] scans through its Governance process.”

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Standards for radiology events and learning meetings ↗
  2. 3 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    George Kearsey↗

    9 Feb 2023 · Graeme Irvine · East London

    “Clinical records were poorly maintained , resulting in an unclear picture of fluid administration.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Barking responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “Cross site audits have been completed on COTE (Care of the Elderly) wards on a random basis to understand a cross section of compliance with fluid management with no notice given to the ward in advance of the audit. The audits capture patients who are on fluid restriction, patients requiring oral and intravenous hydration, parenteral nutrition and output monitoring, whether the intake and output is entered on Careflow Vitals and appropriate action taken as necessary. The audits were completed by”

    Stated timescale: completed

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    CLINICAL ↗
  3. 8 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Thomas Doyle↗

    20 Oct 2023 · Graeme Irvine · East London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “The trust's clinical records were of a particularly poor standard which impeded the Trust's governance investigation and the inquest investigation in determining what, if any consideration was given to the possibility that Mr [name redacted] was suffering from an infection.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:clinicalrecords

    Barking responded, stating 6 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “An Internal Alert has been shared with staff via email, Alert reference Issued Date 9 November 2023 which details good record keeping standards that should be adhered to by all staff.”

    Stated timescale: 9 November 2023

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Set Barking Alert – Furbo Help Center ↗
    “A video has been developed and was placed on the Trust intranet 27 November 2023 which shows - Medical Director (Patient Safety and Patient Experience), explaining the importance of good record keeping.”

    Stated timescale: 27 November 2023

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Do business records management affect business growth? ↗

    4 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  4. 8 months later

    Raised again · 3rd time

    David Morris↗

    4 Jul 2024 · Graeme Irvine · East London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:clinicalrecords

    Barking responded, stating 5 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “The CQC has confirmed that they are reviewing this case, and will consider what further action should be taken, and whether any monitoring of the trust, or regulatory response, is required.”
    “be able to check the wording in their specific product information to ensure the appropriate advice on checking for leaks is present.”

    3 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  5. 4 months later

    Raised again · 4th time

    Chloe Every↗

    25 Oct 2024 · Graeme Irvine · East London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “The investigation of this inquest was prejudiced by the absence of contemporary nursing and medical notes from various stages of [the deceased]'s treatment.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:investigationinquest

    Barking responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “the Trust has put mitigations in place. The Trust provides mandatory training for all staff including both nursing and medical staff related to the care of patients with a Learning Disability.”
    “BHRUT plan to recruit more learning disability nurses in 2025. They have created pathways to encourage and upskill existing staff due to the shortage of nurses going into learning disability training (RNLD).”

    Stated timescale: 2025

  6. All reports to Barking

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error