Skip to content
recurance

Excessive waiting time for psychotherapy

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2018–2019No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 4 Jun 2018 and 12 Feb 2019.

They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2018–2019
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    John Derwent↗

    4 Jun 2018 · Alison Mutch · Manchester (South)

    “The Inquest heard that the target time for an appointment for CBT should be 6 weeks. At the time Mr [name redacted] was referred, the waiting time was 12 months.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group was found for this report.

  2. 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Heather Carey↗

    12 Feb 2019 · Andrew Bridgman · Manchester (South)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “A target waiting list of 18 weeks is far too long but | was told that this was a funding issue.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:targetwaitingweeks

    Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group responded, stating 5 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The CCG is formally monitoring the impact of this investment through regular Safer Staffing Reports presented to the Pennine Care Quality Group. Reports from staff on the Tameside wards and the latest CQC report indicate that this is having a positive impact.”
    “The reviewing team are using this information alongside an exploration of alternative models of care to develop a new model of psychological therapy for people with complex mental health needs in Tameside and Glossop. This review will conclude by the 31 of July 2019.”

    Stated timescale: 31 July 2019

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Quality Standards for Psychological Therapies Services ↗

    3 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  3. All reports to Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error