Skip to content
recurance

Lack of sepsis detection tool in emergency call handling

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2024–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 3 May 2024 and 11 May 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2024–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Michael Clarke↗

    3 May 2024 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    “The evidence before the inquest was that there were no specific sepsis trigger questions on the ambulance pathway.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “NHS England recognises the significant pressure on ambulance services since the Covid-19 pandemic, which has seen longer response times across all categories than before the pandemic, as well as issues associated with handing over ambulance patients in a timely way at some NHS Trusts. NHS England has prioritised improving ambulance performance during 2023/24, supported by the Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services, which was published in January 2023. The plan outlined key”

    Stated timescale: 2023/24

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Ambulance Response Programme (ARP) Impact Assessment ↗
  2. 2 years later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Oliver Shelley↗

    11 May 2026 · Karen Henderson · Surrey

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The lack of a sepsis algorithm pathway to assist the emergency medical advisor (EMA) during 111/999 calls”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:sepsispathway

    NHS England responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error