Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate audit of 111 call errors

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2014–2020No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 19 Dec 2014 and 27 Jan 2020.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from NHS England was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2014–2020
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Samia Shara↗

    19 Dec 2014 · Fiona Willcox · London Inner (West)

    “That long and complex calls made to 999 and 111 should be available for audit by the CCG to identify learning opportunities”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from NHS England was found for this report.

  2. 5 years 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Shanté Turay-Thomas↗

    27 Jan 2020 · Mary Hassell · Inner North London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “When LCW audited the call in the first instance, the audit identified the problem with the address, but failed to recognise how badly the call had gone in other ways.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “Following Ms [name redacted] death, the Practice undertook an audit in October 2019 of all patients who were being prescribed Emerade to ensure that the dosage was in accordance with the BNF based on the respective patients' weight and age. Indeed, all patients who use AAI pens have had their doses reviewed. Patients have been contacted to ensure that they have the correct dose and appropriate knowledge about the use and storage of the pen. Letters were sent to patients on Emerade, which included”

    Stated timescale: October 2019

    “we will consider how best to make clear In CG134 the advice that 2 adrenaline auto-injectors should be prescribed, which patients should carry at 811 tfflls.”
  3. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error