Skip to content
recurance

Adhesions leading to small bowel obstruction

Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2024–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 30 Sept 2024 and 10 May 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2024–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Megan Williams↗

    30 Sept 2024 · James Dillon · Central and South East Kent

    “Independent expert evidence was heard that indicated that the deceased likely had band adhesions - a known complication of her past abdominal surgery.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗
  2. 1 year 7 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Glen Jay↗

    10 May 2026 · Jyoti Gill · Essex

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “There are other clinics nationally who may be offering patients Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum (PPP) to patients who have a history of adhesional small bowel obstruction (ASBO).”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error