Skip to content
recurance

Insufficient family involvement in mental health care processes

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2019–2021No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 13 Dec 2019 and 19 May 2021.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Department of Health and Social Care was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2019–2021
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Steven Marsland↗

    13 Dec 2019 · Alison Mutch · Manchester (South)

    “There was no clear policy about how a family could be effectively engaged by the CMHT;”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Department of Health and Social Care was found for this report.

  2. 1 year 5 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Richard Burgess↗

    19 May 2021 · Derek Winter · Sunderland

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “- a continuous engagement with the family in the "triangle of care", including regular communication and updating life stories;”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “the Trust employs specialist Psychiatrists who are trained to work with patients with dementia, in addition to Care of the Elderly nurses, who provide training and support to staff. The Trust also employs Activity Coordinators who are all actively involved as part of the MDT process and has recently trained 10 members of staff to provide dementia care mapping training across the relevant wards.”

    Stated timescale: 27 July 2021

  3. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error