Skip to content
recurance

Rigid MPDS questioning leads to under‑prioritisation of unconscious patients

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate3 reports · 2015–2025No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 27 May 2015 and 8 Jul 2025.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

3
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2025
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Yusuf Abdismad↗

    27 May 2015 · ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

    “When [the deceased]'s mother replied "no", the EMD went on to ask "Is he conscious?”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    London Ambulance Service NHS Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 3 years 3 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    David Sweeney↗

    19 Aug 2018 · ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
    “A call to the London Ambulance Service regarding a man who had been unconscious did not prompt a red prioritisation.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from London Ambulance Service NHS Trust was found for this report.

  3. 6 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Miles Robinson↗

    8 Jul 2025 · Sian Reeves · South London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · higha different coroner
    “Given the rigidity of the structured questions, there was no capacity within MPDS to account for information provided on behalf of Mr [name redacted] during the first 999 call, namely that he thought and felt like he was having a heart attack.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  4. All reports to London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error