Skip to content
recurance

Lack of VTE assessment and missing anticoagulation documentation

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2015–2025No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 13 Feb 2015 and 17 Jan 2025.

They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2025
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Francoise Snape↗

    13 Feb 2015 · Geraint Williams · Worcestershire

    “No VTE assessment was ever made of Mrs [name redacted]. The explanation given oy was that staff were too busy to complete the form”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust was found for this report.

  2. 9 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Vauna Leeming↗

    17 Jan 2025 · David Reid · Worcestershire

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “(a) on 2 days ( 10 and 13.2.24 ) no documentation was completed by nurses to show whether Enoxaparin had in fact been administered;”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust responded, stating 5 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “i. Ward managers and Matrons, in their daily safety huddles and team meetings, are reinforcing the direction that staff must sign prescription charts.”
    “ii. To update and re-circulate the lesson of the week Trust-wide on mechanical thromboprophylaxis and the importance of signing prescriptions”

    3 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  3. All reports to Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Next

Other chains for Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error