Skip to content
recurance

Delayed police response to welfare incidents

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high2 reports · 2014–2022 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Greater Manchester Police received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 15 Oct 2014 and 21 Dec 2022.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2014–2022
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Lucasz Lewandowski↗

    15 Oct 2014 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    “The timeliness of GMP's response, against a backdrop of lack of adherence to/use of the escalation and call grading protocols.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Greater Manchester Police responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Operational Communications Branch (OCB) has undertaken a review of its Escalation Policy. The intention of this review, which is in its final stages, is to ensure the OCB works effectively with Divisions to enhance its ability to effectively identify areas of risk and then effectively manage the allocation of patrols to address that risk. In cases when it becomes apparent that resources are unavailable for allocation, the Escalation Policy will ensure the incident is brought to the attention”

    Stated timescale: final stages

  2. 8 years 2 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Angeline Phillips↗

    21 Dec 2022 · Alan Walsh · Manchester West

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · higha different coroner
    “In relation to the grading of the lncid.ent relating to the Deceased, which was reported at 18.09 hours on the 29th of January 2021, the Incident was graded correctly as a Grade 2 Priority Response with a response time of 1 hour but a police officer only attended more than 8 hours after the report of the Incident”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:gradingResponse

    Greater Manchester Police responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “Greater Manchester Police (GMP) carried out a thorough review of the Incident Response Policy (IRP) following His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services issuing a formal cause of concern in September 2021, where it was identified that GMP was not responding appropriately to victims of crime and safeguarding vulnerable members of our communities. As a result, on 1st February 2022, GMP implemented the current IRP which incorporates the nationally recognised risk assessm”

    Stated timescale: 1st February 2022

  3. All reports to Greater Manchester Police

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error