Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate documentation of patient observations and assessments

Closely relatedConfidence 0.86 · high3 reports · 2018–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Doncaster Royal Infirmary received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 22 Feb 2018 and 22 Aug 2025.

They came from 3 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 2 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 4 specific actions.

3
reports
3
different coroners
2018–2025
years
0.86
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    James Quinton↗

    22 Feb 2018 · Nicola Mundy · South Yorkshire (East)

    “During the course of the evidence it became clear that the poor quality nursing notes and the lack of information of the observation chart made it difficult for the reviewing Consultants to get a clear picture of events that had been occurring.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Doncaster Royal Infirmary responded, stating 3 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “1. The Emergency Department has considered the use of scribes in the course of resuscitation within the emergency department. The Matron, has discussed this with the Care Group Educator and work has commenced on training individuals as scribes in such situations and to ensure that observations are accurately collated and recorded in the course of the”

    Stated timescale: end of April

    “a working group has been set up with representation from ED and Anaesthetics to explore further the issue of IV drug administration in emergencies during resuscitation. The first meeting is scheduled for the end of April to look at systems and processes for working together within the Resus area.”

    Stated timescale: end of April

    1 more stated action in the Promises tab.

  2. 6 years 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Robert Fuller↗

    2 Apr 2024 · Sarah Slater · South Yorkshire East

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · higha different coroner
    “There was evidence of poor record keeping on the ward. This included behaviour charts, enhanced patient supervision records and daily evaluation charts not being consistently recorded.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:evidencepoor

    Doncaster Royal Infirmary responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “We have taken the opportunity to review and refine our Enhanced Care Policy and this is proceeding through our governance process for sign off over the coming weeks. One of the changes has been to separate our Falls Risk Assessment and Confusion Risk Assessment to support easier recognition of patients who are either a falls risk or those patients who need a designated level of supervision due to behaviours of concern.”

    Stated timescale: coming weeks

  3. 1 year 5 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Lee Stammers↗

    22 Aug 2025 · Louise Slater · South Yorkshire East

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.86 · higha different coroner
    “Poor documentation, Communication, and systems- There were no clear communication, documentation, or systems in place, to identify if investigations had been performed as requested.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Doncaster Royal Infirmary responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  4. All reports to Doncaster Royal Infirmary

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error