Delayed mental health bed allocation leading to patient deterioration
Care Quality Commission received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 13 Dec 2013 and 7 Aug 2016.
They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“MHSC say that following the death of the deceased, a new policy has been introduced so that there is no waiting time at all for the allocation of a bed”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Care Quality Commission responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗
- 2 years 8 months laterIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“The CCG should review urgently its commissioning of in-patient mental health beds so as to ensure, in so far as reasonably practicable, that a bed is available when a person who satisfies the criteria for a Mental Health Act Assessment needs to be detained following that assessment.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Care Quality Commission responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Care Quality Commission
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2013 → 2016Rohan Fitzsimons2 years 8 months after Stephanie Daniels · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight the risk that patients needing inpatient mental health care experience delays or cannot get a bed when required. They both call for systemic action to guarantee bed availability at the point of need.
Stephanie Daniels · 13 Dec 2013
“MHSC say that following the death of the deceased, a new policy has been introduced so that there is no waiting time at all for the allocation of a bed”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Rohan Fitzsimons · 7 Aug 2016
“The CCG should review urgently its commissioning of in-patient mental health beds so as to ensure, in so far as reasonably practicable, that a bed is available when a person who satisfies the criteria for a Mental Health Act Assessment needs to be detained following that assessment.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“A revised governance process has been developed within the Citywide Commissioning, Quality and Safeguarding Team and the Trust now attends an established Citywide Patient Safety Committee. This committee meets monthly and is responsible for the review and monitoring of serious incidents requiring investigation reported by the Trust as well as any other patient safety related issues including those highlighted at inquest via Prevention of Future Death Reports.”
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Care Quality Commission at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 → 2016 | 0.69 | 0.20 | Identical · 0.90 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Care Quality Commission
- Inaccurate and inconsistent care plan entries and record keeping10 reports · 2017–2026
- Ambulance handover delays at hospitals reduce availability3 reports · 2015–2026
- Non‑compliance with care plans and insufficient incident review5 reports · 2016–2026
- Inadequate repositioning and monitoring of at-risk patients2 reports · 2013–2025
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.