Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate escalation of clinical care

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2015–2017No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 21 Oct 2015 and 6 Apr 2017.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
1
coroner
2015–2017
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Samantha Beach↗

    21 Oct 2015 · Katy Skerrett · Gloucestershire

    “The clinical care provided to [name redacted] in the obstetric department was not escalated appropriately to more senior colleagues,”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust was found for this report.

  2. 1 year 6 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Steven Amos↗

    6 Apr 2017 · Katy Skerrett · Gloucestershire

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “Whether there is appropriate escalation of care given to a patient who acutely deteriorates during the night shifts over the weekend period.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  3. All reports to Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error