Skip to content
recurance

Window restrictors fail to prevent opening beyond 100mm

Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2015–2024 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 8 Oct 2015 and 21 Jun 2024.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2024
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Rebecca Jones↗

    8 Oct 2015 · Edward Thomas · Hertfordshire

    “window restrictors may be inadequate in preventing a determined effort to force a window open beyond the 100mm restriction”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “NHS England is spending £15m in 2016/17 to boost provision in those areas that need it most. This will include improving standards in existing places of safety to ensure that they are equipped to care for people safely and compassionately when detained under the Mental Health Act”

    Stated timescale: 2016/17

  2. 8 years 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Terrence Taylor↗

    21 Jun 2024 · Keith Morton · Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “window restrictors tested to current British Standards may be inadequate in preventing a determined effort to force a window open beyond 100mm”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:windowrestrictorsinadequatepreventingdeterminedeffort

    Department of Health and Social Care responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error