Skip to content
recurance

Missing mental health assessment in police custody

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high4 reports · 2017–2023 One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 4 coroners' reports about this hazard between 17 Feb 2017 and 8 Jun 2023.

They came from 4 different coroners in 3 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 3 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 3 of the 3 earlier reports, stating 10 specific actions.

4
reports
4
different coroners
2017–2023
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Dean Saunders↗

    17 Feb 2017 · Caroline Beasley-Murray · Essex

    “The admitted lacuna in the SEPT admissions protocol governing the transfer of mentally disordered people from police custody.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The following information describes the commissioning arrangements for healthcare for someone being held in police custody.”

    Web search (Tavily): Evidence found that the action was carried out

    Health and Justice Commissioning Intentions 2015/16 ↗
  2. 2 years 5 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    David Jukes↗

    12 Jul 2019 · Emma Brown · Birmingham and Solihull

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “Despite not being informed by the BCPFT liaison and diversion nurse that Mr [name redacted] was in custody the HTT were made aware by his wife that he was in custody on the 28th September 2018.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    NHS England responded, stating 6 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “NHS England and NHS Improvement will work with police forces to ensure that all relevant information from a police perspective is given to the liaison and diversion practitioner, including the nature of the detained person's presentation at the point of arrest, if relevant.”

    Stated timescale: end of March 2020

    “We will commit to a national event by the end of March 2020 to debrief on this matter and any other information sharing/exchange issues that have been raised in other reports.”

    Stated timescale: end of March 2020

    4 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  3. 2 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Khalid Yousef↗

    23 Jun 2022 · James Bennett · Birmingham and Solihull

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The L&D police custody suite model has not commissioned psychiatrists.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:policecustody

    NHS England responded, stating 3 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Trust takes these issues very seriously. The Team Manager is now working on a project which will be completed by the end of October 2022 to review the current induction programme and produce an up to date induction programme which is suited to different team roles and areas of work. This will include an induction pack, shadowing and training package for all new staff and students. As part of the new tender process, the Trust have also planned to have psychologists join the L&D for reflective”

    Stated timescale: end of October 2022

    “The Trust takes these issues very seriously. The Team Manager is now working on a project which will be completed by the end of October 2022 to review the current induction programme and produce an up to date induction programme which is suited to different team roles and areas of work. This will include an induction pack, shadowing and training package for all new staff and students. As part of the new tender process, the Trust have also planned to have psychologists join the L&D for reflective”

    Stated timescale: end of October 2022

    1 more stated action in the Promises tab.

  4. 11 months later

    Raised again · 3rd time

    Ivan Ignatov↗

    8 Jun 2023 · Rachael Griffin · Dorset

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · higha different coroner
    “During his time in police custody, it was identified by the custody sergeants that [the deceased] required a face to face assessment by the mental health practitioner. This did not happen.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗
  5. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error