Skip to content
recurance

Delayed emergency department treatment due to overcrowding

Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2023–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 4 Feb 2023 and 9 Apr 2025.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
1
coroner
2023–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Patricia Green↗

    4 Feb 2023 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    “Mrs [name redacted] wait of 3 hours in ED was not unusual and was due to the volume of patients waiting to be seen and the overall demand on ED.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “we published our 'Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services' which aims to deliver sustained improvements in waiting times. Our ambitions for this year are to improve A&E waiting times to 78% of patients to be admitted, transferred, or discharged from A&E within four hours by March 2025, and to reduce Category 2 ambulance response times to 30 minutes on average across this fiscal year.”

    Stated timescale: March 2025

  2. 2 years 2 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Bernard Lyon↗

    9 Apr 2025 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
    “The Emergency Department at TGH was extremely busy on the day Mr [name redacted] arrived which was not unusual. The sheer volume of patients who were seriously ill meant that there was a delay in him being given antibiotics in accordance with his need.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:unusualvolumepatients

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “the CQC is replying to you separately”

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

  3. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error