Skip to content
recurance

Incomplete and inaccurate nursing records and documentation

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high3 reports · 2015–2017 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 15 Jul 2015 and 28 Nov 2017.

They came from 1 coroner. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 2 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 13 specific actions.

3
reports
1
coroner
2015–2017
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Joyce Hartford↗

    15 Jul 2015 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    “During the course of the inquest hearing it became apparent that the nursing tools (in particular, the 'Purpose T'), assessments, records, associated documentation and nursing discharge summary were incomplete and/or inaccurate.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust responded, stating 6 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “We are undertaking a review of current documentation to ensure it meets all Trust standards and therefore supports improvements in care delivery. On a monthly basis the ward is audited using the nursing metrics which includes the quality of record keeping.”

    Stated timescale: July 2015

    “¢ Since January 2015 Ward T7 has recruited into a number of vacant registered nurse posts; as part of the induction for these new staff we have developed an induction booklet which includes the requirement for a senior member of the nursing team to observe the staff member undertaking various tasks to confirm that these are being performed competently - this includes completion of documentation such as District Nurse referrals, SKIN bundles (for tissue viability) and Rounding Tools”

    Stated timescale: January 2015

    4 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  2. 1 year later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Dominic Smith↗

    30 Jun 2016 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “Staff did not follow the Trust's protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where - they exercised clinical discretion”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust responded, stating 7 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “the RCPCH is unable to comment on the specifics of the case and the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust has been asked to respond directly on local communication, record keeping and policies and procedures.”
    “The Division of Women and Children's is undertaking a programme of rolling audits on communication and documentation. The purpose is to ensure compliance with policy standards and to identify areas where there are challenges in order to implement remediating measures.”

    5 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  3. 1 year 5 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    John Lea↗

    28 Nov 2017 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high
    “Gaps within the documentation/record keeping/missing entries by both doctors and nurses (including fluid balance charts for a patient in heart failure and subject to fluid restriction, risk assessments, care planning, rounding tool and medical attendance upon the deceased).”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  4. All reports to Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Next

Other chains for Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error