Skip to content
recurance

Medication monitoring and discharge risk assessment failures

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate4 reports · 2016–2024No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Pennine Care NHS Trust received 4 coroners' reports about this hazard between 29 Feb 2016 and 12 Aug 2024.

They came from 3 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 3 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 2 of the 3 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

4
reports
3
different coroners
2016–2024
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Susan George↗

    29 Feb 2016 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    “No review of the decision to discharge was sought or conducted when it became apparent that there had been a material change in [the deceased]'s presentation on the 10th November.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Care NHS Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The discharge assessment document is prepared prior to planned discharges and is then completed on the day of discharge by the discharge nurse. The final page of this document is the 'Discharge Plan' which contains the emergency contact numbers and a crisis contingency plan. A copy of this is handed to the patient upon discharge.”
  2. 2 years 5 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Astonn Mitchell-Male↗

    26 Jul 2018 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    “There is no policy in existence within the Trust to address the process of patient medication monitoring/compliance and the triangulation of corroborative information, particularly within the community setting.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Pennine Care NHS Trust was found for this report.

  3. 2 years 3 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Sean Owen↗

    23 Oct 2020 · Catherine McKenna · Manchester North

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “The Discharge Letter that was sent to Mr [name redacted] GP on 6 February 2019 was prepared by a doctor who had little involvement in his care and was not counter-checked by a senior clinician.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Care NHS Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The Clinical Director for the Borough has established process that ensures: - All new medical trainees receive a presentation regarding the standards expected and process of writing admission/discharge summaries. - During their first month working on the wards all new trainees have their written admission/discharge summaries checked and discussed at the ward round held prior to discharge of the patient. A senior doctor checks the documentation.”
  4. 3 years 10 months later

    Raised again · 3rd time

    David Thompson↗

    12 Aug 2024 · Joanne Kearsley · Manchester North

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “A discharge clinical entry and discharge risk assessment was not completed and there was no evidence of crisis information having been provided.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Pennine Care NHS Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  5. All reports to Pennine Care NHS Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error