Skip to content
recurance

Delayed recognition of excited delirium in ambulance dispatch

Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2019–2026No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

NHS England received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 21 Feb 2019 and 6 Jan 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from NHS England was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2019–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Terrence Smith↗

    21 Feb 2019 · Richard Travers · Surrey

    “The version of NHS Pathways currently in use is version 16 which does not enable operators to recognise potential ED / ABD and respond accordingly.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from NHS England was found for this report.

  2. 6 years 10 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Robert Gracey↗

    6 Jan 2026 · Paul Smith · Greater Lincolnshire

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “Under the current NHS Pathways system, ABD does not have its own allocation pathway.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗
  3. All reports to NHS England

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error