← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Inadequate nighttime patient observation documentation

Organisation: The Priory Group · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/e68e998d3897b35f

The earlier warning

Neil Carter · 5 Mar 2014 · Sean Cummings, London (West)

“There were repeated failures to perform basic nursing observations”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/neil-carter

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Neil Carter (5 Mar 2014) · stated timescale: none stated

“In response to points one and three, | understand that the records falsification and a number of key missing observations in Mr [name redacted] case for the afternoon he absconded from the ward, fell to one nurse, | am informed that the relevant individual was disciplined through Priory's internal processes and dismissed from employment. She was also referred to the NMC as her actions fell short of the standard required.”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0103-Response-by-Priory-Group.pdf

What recurred

  • 31 Oct 2016 · Anthony McManus · Thomas Osborne · Identical hazard · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Neil Carter · 5 Mar 2014

“There were repeated failures to perform basic nursing observations”

Later · Anthony McManus · 31 Oct 2016

“The system of observations carried out within the unit, particularly at night is in need of reform.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.