← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Inconsistent antenatal CTG interpretation leading to delayed response

Organisation: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/c84e74beac1c1f2f

The earlier warning

Isa Mushtaq · 24 Sept 2014 · Sara Lewis, Manchester (City)

“In clinical practice the fetal CTG continues to be a source of problems, both in interpretation and in what degree of action should be taken.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/isa-mushtaq

What was promised

No published response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists was found for the earlier reports.

What recurred

  • 22 Feb 2017 · Maxim Karpovich · David Hinchliff · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Isa Mushtaq · 24 Sept 2014

“In clinical practice the fetal CTG continues to be a source of problems, both in interpretation and in what degree of action should be taken.”

Later · Maxim Karpovich · 22 Feb 2017

“This training should address pattern recognition, pathophysiology of foetal heart rate changes, clinical scenarios with CTG's and appropriate responses.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.