← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Recurring hazard (see the quoted concerns)

Organisation: Department of Health and Social Care · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/ad9d92eaa9690bdd

The earlier warning

Jonathan Kingsman · 13 Jul 2021 · Simon Milburn, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough

“the risk assessment requires no consideration of risk factors other than mobility unless 'Step 1' is passed regardless of the number of other risk factors”

judiciary.uk/…/jonathan-kingsman

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Jonathan Kingsman (13 Jul 2021) · stated timescale: none stated

“my officials have made enquiries with NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEI), and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)”

judiciary.uk/…/2021-0238-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Soc…

What recurred

  • 24 Jul 2023 · Christine Nakafeero · Graeme Irvine · Identical hazard · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Jonathan Kingsman · 13 Jul 2021

“the risk assessment requires no consideration of risk factors other than mobility unless 'Step 1' is passed regardless of the number of other risk factors”

Later · Christine Nakafeero · 24 Jul 2023

“The clinicians treating Ms [name redacted] assessed her VTE risk utilising an established algorithm based on national guidance. The assessment was undertaken appropriately but it failed to identify two risk factors”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.