← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Staggered A16/B1166 junction design hazard

Organisation: Department for Transport · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/a27fe5b7b53acd62

The earlier warning

Sheila Slater · 31 Mar 2016 · ARW Forrest, South Lincolnshire

“The staggered junction of the A16 with the B1166 is part of the Crowland Bypass which was opened in 2010.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/sheila-slater

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Sheila Slater (31 Mar 2016) · stated timescale: none stated

“The relevant team have been informed of these concerns”

judiciary.uk/…/2016-0127-Response-from-Department-for-Transport…

Stated action 2 · response to Sheila Slater (31 Mar 2016) · stated timescale: none stated

“An assessment of all options available to the Trust to improve communication with community prescribing agencies by the Deputy Chief Medical Officer. [name redacted] included sharing of confidential patient information in a secure manner.”

judiciary.uk/…/2026-0127-Response-from-The-Great-Western-Hospit…

What recurred

  • 7 Mar 2019 · Matthew Bilby · Timothy Brennard · Identical hazard · confidence 0.95 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Sheila Slater · 31 Mar 2016

“The staggered junction of the A16 with the B1166 is part of the Crowland Bypass which was opened in 2010.”

Later · Matthew Bilby · 7 Mar 2019

“The court heard evidence from a number of current regular road users describing the 1 layout of the A16/B1166 junction as”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.