Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports
Pre-inquest brief
Lack of street lighting on A50
The earlier warning
Aditya Puri · 9 Aug 2018 · Rachel Syed, Derby & Derbyshire
“(1) The A50 in question does not have street lighting. Street lighting in this area would be beneficial to prevent future deaths occurring.”
What was promised
Stated action 1 · response to Aditya Puri (9 Aug 2018) · stated timescale: none stated
“Update to the Regulation 28 response from Highways England concerning the death of [the deceased] PURI. C) Detailed investigations will be undertaken on the fatal accidents occurring on the A50 between junction 3 and junction 4 to understand the wider context of the accidents occurring, gathering information pertaining to the highway and its environs.”
What recurred
- 22 Feb 2019 · Doreen Fell · Paul O'Donnell · Closely related · confidence 0.85 (high)
The clearest link, quoted from both reports:
Earlier · Aditya Puri · 9 Aug 2018
“(1) The A50 in question does not have street lighting. Street lighting in this area would be beneficial to prevent future deaths occurring.”
Later · Doreen Fell · 22 Feb 2019
“The low levels of natural light on this section accentuates the present lack of any street lighting on this section of road which may otherwise assist pedestrians with executing a safe crossing during the hours of darkness.”
What happened next
No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.