← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Lack of family involvement in crisis care

Organisation: Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/718b083d4c78fbcf

The earlier warning

Emily Voukelatou · 11 Jan 2017 · ME Hassell, London Inner (North)

“I heard evidence from the consultant psychiatrist responsible for Ms [name redacted] care at Crisis House that it is not routine for the crisis team to involve family members in the care of a patient.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/emily-voukelatou

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Emily Voukelatou (11 Jan 2017) · stated timescale: last year

“We have also reinforced the importance of working with families in our updated, risk assessment training which has been rolled out over the last 12 months.”

judiciary.uk/…/2017-0004-Response-by-Camden-and-Islington-NHS-T…

Stated action 2 · response to Emily Voukelatou (11 Jan 2017) · stated timescale: none stated

“we have issued staff at North Camden Crisis House with clear guidance to ensure that numbers and contact details are clearly provided to families participating in a services user's care so they are able to speak directly to a senior staff member.”

judiciary.uk/…/2017-0004-Response-by-Camden-and-Islington-NHS-T…

What recurred

  • 23 Apr 2024 · Emmanuel Ladapo · Mary Hassell · Closely related · confidence 0.85 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Emily Voukelatou · 11 Jan 2017

“I heard evidence from the consultant psychiatrist responsible for Ms [name redacted] care at Crisis House that it is not routine for the crisis team to involve family members in the care of a patient.”

Later · Emmanuel Ladapo · 23 Apr 2024

“Mr [name redacted] lived with his sister, who wanted very much to be involved with his care. However, I did not hear any evidence of engagement with her by C&I, either:”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.