← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Delay in declaring missing and informing police

Organisation: Sussex Partnership NHS Trust · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/6399b22156a19350

The earlier warning

John Walker · 21 Aug 2013 · Christopher Wilkinson, West Sussex

“concern was raised by the family with regard to the length of time taken before Mr [name redacted] could be declared missing and the police informed.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/john-walker

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to John Walker (21 Aug 2013) · stated timescale: none stated

“we have since revised the documents clinicians are asked to complete. This is to ensure they are less repetitive and better support succinct recording of relevant issues. Regular audits are completed to ensure adequate standards are met.”

judiciary.uk/…/2013-0213-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Fou…

What recurred

  • 18 Jan 2018 · Paul Hanton · Penelope Schofield · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · John Walker · 21 Aug 2013

“concern was raised by the family with regard to the length of time taken before Mr [name redacted] could be declared missing and the police informed.”

Later · Paul Hanton · 18 Jan 2018

“Need for clear information to be given by hospital staff when making the 999 call to report a patient has gone AWOL”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.