← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Insufficient ambulance resources leading to delayed response

Organisation: South East Coast Ambulance Service · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/6126f25c2e39549e

The earlier warning

Kevan Funnell · 27 Feb 2018 · Veronica Hamilton-Deeley, West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

“the ambulance was so delayed in its response to Mr [name redacted]”

judiciary.uk/…/kevan-funnell-prevention-of-future-deaths-report

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Kevan Funnell (27 Feb 2018) · stated timescale: none stated

“We are currently working with our commissioners in a jointly commissioned demand and capacity review, intended to better align our resource requirements to the demands on our service, particularly in the light of the newly introduced Ambulance Response Programme standards.”

judiciary.uk/…/2024-0095-Response-from-South-East-Coast-Ambulan…

Stated action 2 · response to Margaret Stemp (25 Jun 2018) · stated timescale: next three years

“We are aiming to recruit an additional 300 ambulance crew members, so we will have more resources that we can call upon for times of maximum demand.”

judiciary.uk/…/2018-0198-Response-by-South-East-Coast-Ambulance…

Stated action 3 · response to Veronica Jenkins (31 Mar 2023) · stated timescale: 31 March 2023

“SECAmb had planned for 2370.1 WTE by 31 March 2023.”

judiciary.uk/…/2023-0112-Response-from-South-East-Coast-Ambulan…

What recurred

  • 25 Jun 2018 · Margaret Stemp · Penelope Schofield
  • 31 Mar 2023 · Veronica Jenkins · Anna Crawford · Closely related · confidence 0.92 (high)
  • 26 Jun 2023 · Ginger Wright · Anna Crawford · Closely related · confidence 0.85 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Margaret Stemp · 25 Jun 2018

“(1) That there were insufficient resources to deal with the high number of calls on”

Later · Veronica Jenkins · 31 Mar 2023

“There is a risk of a future reoccurrence of the situation which arose on 10 May 2022, namely a deficit in operational hours provided by SECAMBS leading to delayed response times compromising patient safety.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.