← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Lack of relevant information sharing during ACCT reviews

Organisation: Care UK · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/5a9a398186ea1ca4

The earlier warning

Geraldine Kilborn · 10 Dec 2014 · Andrew Tweddle, County Durham & Darlington

“There was a clear breakdown in sharing of information known to the mental health team with other members of some ACCT reviews.”

judiciary.uk/…/geraldine-kilborn

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Geraldine Kilborn (10 Dec 2014) · stated timescale: none stated

“an amended arrangement has been put in place to facilitate the presence of a member of the mental health team at ACCT reviews that take place at the weekend”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0532-Response-by-NOMS.pdf

Stated action 2 · response to Geraldine Kilborn (10 Dec 2014) · stated timescale: April 2015

“From April 2015 the health service delivery model will change from a Prime Provider model to a 7 Lot commissioning model .The National Health Service Commissioning Board has procured seven services - GP Services including Pharmacy, Dental, Optometry, Community Care, Non-Clinical Substance Misuse, Mental Health and Support Services.”

judiciary.uk/…/2014-0532-Response-by-Care-UK.pdf

What recurred

  • 18 Dec 2017 · Mark Doyle · Heather Williams · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Geraldine Kilborn · 10 Dec 2014

“There was a clear breakdown in sharing of information known to the mental health team with other members of some ACCT reviews.”

Later · Mark Doyle · 18 Dec 2017

“Although, , Head of Healthcare, described how healthcare staff have received recent encouragement to make entries on a prisoner's ACCT in relation to matters that could bear on risk, I am concerned that this does not go far enough to change past practice and ensure that relevant information is shared, in light of the prison staff's lack of access to System One records and the infrequent occasions that Care UK staff made entries on Mr [name redacted] ACCT daily record.”

What happened next

No evidence found either way · a stated action in a response

“When a loved one is sent to prison, it's natural to feel concerned about their well-being, especially in the unfamiliar environment of a custodial setting. One of the key priorities of the prison service is **safer custody**, which refers to the systems and procedures in place to protect individuals from harm, ensure their physical and mental well-being, and prevent self-harm or incidents of violence”

Prisoner Wellbeing (Safer Custody) - POPS · partnersofprisoners.co.uk/…/prisoner-wellbeing-safer-custody

No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.