← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Lack of mental health act assessment before release

Organisation: West Midlands Police · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/1f9b3a3acddf982e

The earlier warning

Richard Carlon · 22 Jul 2019 · Louise Hunt, Birmingham and Solihull

“No approved Mental Health practitioner was available to make the Mental Health Act assessment of Mr [name redacted] on 14/11/18. I was told this was an ongoing problem and was delaying assessments.”

judiciary.uk/prevention-of-future-death-reports/richard-carlon

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Richard Carlon (22 Jul 2019) · stated timescale: by November 2019

“West Midlands Police will ensure any caller is updated when a missing person has been located to allow further contact between parties. This may not always mean full details of whereabouts are disclosed (as individual cases may prevent this from being appropriate) however, the reasons for this will be recorded and explained in each case.”

judiciary.uk/…/2019-0287-Response-by-Staffordshire-and-West-Mid…

What recurred

  • 12 Aug 2024 · Parminder Sanghera · Zafar Siddique · Closely related · confidence 0.90 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Richard Carlon · 22 Jul 2019

“No approved Mental Health practitioner was available to make the Mental Health Act assessment of Mr [name redacted] on 14/11/18. I was told this was an ongoing problem and was delaying assessments.”

Later · Parminder Sanghera · 12 Aug 2024

“During the course of the inquest, I heard evidence Mr [name redacted] was deemed to be suffering from behavioural issues rather than a mental health crisis and no full Mental Health Act assessment took place either at New Cross Hospital or whilst in custody at Oldbury Police station.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.