← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Unregulated sale of prescription sedatives online

Organisation: Media and Sport · Generated: 26 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/1082b8be23ddd639

The earlier warning

Kimberley Liu · 21 Dec 2023 · Ian Potter, Inner North London

“The evidence revealed that from at least 2019, [name redacted] had regularly accessed websites specifically aimed at selling prescription-only medications (predominantly medications with a sedative effect) that allowed repeat orders on the same day and did not require a prescription.”

judiciary.uk/…/kimberley-liu-prevention-of-future-deaths-report

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Kimberley Liu (21 Dec 2023) · stated timescale: none stated

“The MHRA has a dedicated Criminal Enforcement Unit (CEU) that works with partners across government and policing to prevent and disrupt this illegal trade and to bring to justice those involved.”

judiciary.uk/…/2023-0544-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and…

What recurred

  • 23 Apr 2025 · Christopher Brazil · Louisa Corcoran · Closely related · confidence 0.85 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Kimberley Liu · 21 Dec 2023

“The evidence revealed that from at least 2019, [name redacted] had regularly accessed websites specifically aimed at selling prescription-only medications (predominantly medications with a sedative effect) that allowed repeat orders on the same day and did not require a prescription.”

Later · Christopher Brazil · 23 Apr 2025

“(1) There are unregulated and unlawful websites offering prescription only medicines and controlled drugs, which look legitimate and are found easily from simple online searches; and these sites give rise to the following points (2) to (6)”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.